News
NEWS
Introduced on 3 March 2026, Bill No. 2544 overhauls the criminal framework governing violations of restrictive measures adopted by the European Union. It seeks to transpose into French law Directive (EU) 2024/1226 of 24 April 2024, which requires Member States to establish criminal offences for violation and circumvention of EU
Review of the 2024 CCF Activity Report, accessible here: https://www.interpol.int/Who-we-are/Commission-for-the-Control-of-INTERPOL-s-Files-CCF/About-the-CCF
On March 4th 2024, Maître Amélie Beauchemin was invited to France24 alongside Charlotte Minvielle, Alice Ackermann and Hélène de Lauzun to debate the recent enshrinement of the freedom to have an abortion in the French Constitution. On March 8th, the French Constitution was amended to include the freedom to have
Maître Julié was invited by France 24 following the hearing at the International Court of Justice on the case 𝘚𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘩 𝘈𝘧𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘷. 𝘐𝘴𝘳𝘢𝘦𝘭 regarding alleged violations of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide by Israel against the Palestinian people in Gaza. In a politically
Maître Julié reacts to the situation of the plane immobilized in the Marne department coming from India, and talks about the asylum application procedure in front of OFPRA to obtain refugee status following suspicions of human trafficking.
Maître William JULIÉ provided details on the complaint lodged by associations regarding racial profiling practices by the police in the context of identity checks. After outlining the scope of such checks and their various legal bases they rely upon, he emphaisized the risks of profiling during administrative police checks in
William JULIÉ debated about the shooting of a teenager by a police officer who is now facing murder charges. He discussed the legal frameworks applicable to the use of firearms by French police but also more in depth the unresolved issues of French society with its banlieues.
William JULIÉ reacted to Eya’s abduction by her father and the arrest of the latter in Denmark. He explained the rules governing international child abduction, the European arrest warrant mechanism and other points of criminal international law.
William JULIÉ intervened following the sentencing of Douha Mounib, a French women repatriated from Syria where she joined ISIS, to 12 years in prison. He review the complexe incrimination of terrorist conspiracy and the harsh sentences encountered by their authoris in France and in other EU countries.
William JULIÉ reacted to Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON’s comments and provides a legal analysis. He points out that terrorism, despite a UN convention specifically devoted to defining and punishing terrorism, is well and truly defined in European Union Law as well as in numerous sectoral international conventions. He also refers to the
Regarding the atrocities perpetrated by Hamas in Israel, William JULIÉ indicates the probability of their classification as crimes against humanity. He claims that the acts perpetrated in the past by this organisation can be used to aulify the systematicity of these attacks.
Article on the succession dispute involving a Russian oligarch, whose interests are represented by WJ Avocats.
WJ Avocats participated in the 2024 edition of the ICLG Sanctions Laws and Regulations Report. The firm drafted the part on the French sanctions regime. It gives an overview of all restrictive measures created and applied by the French authorities: UN, EU and national sanctions. This year’s edition stresses the
Mr William Julié answers the question of whether it is possible to judge individuals responsible for the war in Ukraine. In this case, Ukraine is putting forward a strong rule of law which allows the executors to be judged in a proper manner, which calls for international criminal justice to
Following the remand in custody of a Marseilles police officer suspected of violence during the riots, Maître William JULIÉ provided clarification on criminal procedure, in particular with regard to the conditions surrounding pre-trial custody pending trial.
William JULIÉ discussed, in tandem with his colleague Antoine GAUTIER-SAUVAGNAC, the situation of their client, Mr AKHMEDOV. He also pointed out the implementation of a strategy to circumvent the power of judges by the Council of the European Union, which has further extended the possibilities of sanctions, in particular to
William JULIÉ made clarifications on the report addressed to the Paris public prosecutor’s office by two deputies regarding the influencer Dylan Thiry under Article 40 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure, and went over the rules of French territorial jurisdiction in criminal matters.
William JULIÉ commented on the tense situation between Mayotte and the Comoros following the expulsions carried out by the French Ministry of the Interior. He explained how the emerging territorial dispute between the two states could come under the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
William Julie, Sophie Menegon, and Juliette Fauvarque Volume 12, Issue 3 of New Journal of European Criminal Law https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844211026378 This article purports to analyze the role conferred to the requesting State in domestic extradition procedures. Despite the existence of a judicial control over extradition, the majority of States included in
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
What is the essence of the rule against the extradition of nationals? In which cases and across which States does it apply?
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
The entry into force of the Agreement on cooperation between the United Kingdom and the European Union (hereinafter “EU”) has led to a decrease of certain rights for wanted individuals, but should not in principle, have consequences regarding the protection of fundamental rights.
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
On 31 January 2020, the United Kingdom officially left the European Union (« EU »). The transition period provided for by the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU («the Withdrawal Agreement »), during which the Union’s law was still applicable, in particular regarding criminal cooperation,
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
This article intends to identify the legal actions which have or could be led against China in order to render this State accountable for the damages caused by the COVID-19. Several proceedings have already been initiated by individuals or NGOs against the Chinese authorities at the domestic or international level.
