News
NEWS
Introduced on 3 March 2026, Bill No. 2544 overhauls the criminal framework governing violations of restrictive measures adopted by the European Union. It seeks to transpose into French law Directive (EU) 2024/1226 of 24 April 2024, which requires Member States to establish criminal offences for violation and circumvention of EU
Review of the 2024 CCF Activity Report, accessible here: https://www.interpol.int/Who-we-are/Commission-for-the-Control-of-INTERPOL-s-Files-CCF/About-the-CCF
“William Julié, criminal and human rights attorney, spoke to France 24’s François Picard about the repatriation of women and children to France from Syrian jihadist camps, following the third major repatriation in six months. This, as rights groups have long pushed for the return of mothers and children to France
William JULIÉ intervened following the attack on the Kurds in the 10th arrondissement of Paris. He detailed the constitutive elements of the terrorist offence and indicated that the racist motive alone does not characterise this offence.
William JULIÉ gives a quick legal definition of the terrorist act in relation to the massacre in the rue d’Enghien.
William JULIÉ provides details on the arrest of Imam Iquouissen by the Belgian authorities. He explained the modalities of execution of the European arrest warrants. In particular, he detailed the notion of double criminality. While some offences do not require double criminality, in other cases, the executing country must repress
William JULIÉ questioned the compatibility of the decisions of the French Court of Cassation in the Italian “brigadist” cases with articles 2, 6 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights and made a number of comments in support of the interests of the Italian State.
William JULIÉ reacted to the international arrest warrant issued by the Pre-Trial Chamber of the International Criminal Court against Vladimir Putin. He spoke of the risks faced by the Russian President and highlighted the difficulties of enforcing this type of arrest warrant.
William JULIÉ challenged the arguments put forward by the Council of the European Union to justify placing and keeping his client, Mr AKHMEDOV, on the sanctions list. He also pointed out the material errors and irregularities that have marred the Council’s decisions since the first sanctions were imposed.
The Court of Cassation will rule on the extradition of ten people convicted in Italy during the “Years of Lead”. William JULIÉ made new observations on behalf of the Italian State in the so-called “Brigadist” cases.
William JULIÉ intervened after the attack on rue d’Enghien, in the 10th arrondissement of Paris. He explained that the qualification of a terrorist attack could be retained if its constitutive elements were established.
William JULIÉ intervened after the attack on rue d’Enghien, in the 10th arrondissement of Paris. He explained that the qualification of a terrorist attack could be retained if its constitutive elements were established.
William JULIÉ gives a quick legal definition of the terrorist act in relation to the massacre in the rue d’Enghien.
William JULIÉ commented on the High Court’s decision concerning the deportation of asylum seekers to Rwanda. This decision authorises such a deportation but obliges the British government to examine the particular situation of the applicants. It does not close the door to an individual appeal to the ECHR, so the
William Julie was asked about the fate of Russian deserters and their possible admission to the European Union. He specified that admission is subject to the rules of each Member State, which lack harmonisation at EU level and have variable delays. He pointed out that since 12 September 2022 the
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
William Julie, Sophie Menegon, and Juliette Fauvarque Volume 12, Issue 3 of New Journal of European Criminal Law https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844211026378 This article purports to analyze the role conferred to the requesting State in domestic extradition procedures. Despite the existence of a judicial control over extradition, the majority of States included in
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
What is the essence of the rule against the extradition of nationals? In which cases and across which States does it apply?
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
The entry into force of the Agreement on cooperation between the United Kingdom and the European Union (hereinafter “EU”) has led to a decrease of certain rights for wanted individuals, but should not in principle, have consequences regarding the protection of fundamental rights.
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
On 31 January 2020, the United Kingdom officially left the European Union (« EU »). The transition period provided for by the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU («the Withdrawal Agreement »), during which the Union’s law was still applicable, in particular regarding criminal cooperation,
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
This article intends to identify the legal actions which have or could be led against China in order to render this State accountable for the damages caused by the COVID-19. Several proceedings have already been initiated by individuals or NGOs against the Chinese authorities at the domestic or international level.
