News
NEWS
Camille Gosson participated to The Debate, on the day Nicolas Sarkozy started executing his sentence, as the Court of First Instance found him guilty of criminal conspiracy and convicted him to 5 years of imprisonment, with immediate effect, despite his appeal and the principle of suspensive effect under French law.
William Julié comments on the recent conviction of former French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment for criminal association in connection with the “Libyan case.” He provides insight into the nature of this offence as well as the mechanism of provisional enforcement of the sentence.
William JULIÉ reacted to Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON’s comments and provides a legal analysis. He points out that terrorism, despite a UN convention specifically devoted to defining and punishing terrorism, is well and truly defined in European Union Law as well as in numerous sectoral international conventions. He also refers to the
Regarding the atrocities perpetrated by Hamas in Israel, William JULIÉ indicates the probability of their classification as crimes against humanity. He claims that the acts perpetrated in the past by this organisation can be used to aulify the systematicity of these attacks.
Article on the succession dispute involving a Russian oligarch, whose interests are represented by WJ Avocats.
WJ Avocats participated in the 2024 edition of the ICLG Sanctions Laws and Regulations Report. The firm drafted the part on the French sanctions regime. It gives an overview of all restrictive measures created and applied by the French authorities: UN, EU and national sanctions. This year’s edition stresses the
Mr William Julié answers the question of whether it is possible to judge individuals responsible for the war in Ukraine. In this case, Ukraine is putting forward a strong rule of law which allows the executors to be judged in a proper manner, which calls for international criminal justice to
Following the remand in custody of a Marseilles police officer suspected of violence during the riots, Maître William JULIÉ provided clarification on criminal procedure, in particular with regard to the conditions surrounding pre-trial custody pending trial.
William JULIÉ discussed, in tandem with his colleague Antoine GAUTIER-SAUVAGNAC, the situation of their client, Mr AKHMEDOV. He also pointed out the implementation of a strategy to circumvent the power of judges by the Council of the European Union, which has further extended the possibilities of sanctions, in particular to
William JULIÉ made clarifications on the report addressed to the Paris public prosecutor’s office by two deputies regarding the influencer Dylan Thiry under Article 40 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure, and went over the rules of French territorial jurisdiction in criminal matters.
William JULIÉ commented on the tense situation between Mayotte and the Comoros following the expulsions carried out by the French Ministry of the Interior. He explained how the emerging territorial dispute between the two states could come under the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
William Julie, Sophie Menegon, and Juliette Fauvarque Volume 12, Issue 3 of New Journal of European Criminal Law https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844211026378 This article purports to analyze the role conferred to the requesting State in domestic extradition procedures. Despite the existence of a judicial control over extradition, the majority of States included in
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
What is the essence of the rule against the extradition of nationals? In which cases and across which States does it apply?
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
The entry into force of the Agreement on cooperation between the United Kingdom and the European Union (hereinafter “EU”) has led to a decrease of certain rights for wanted individuals, but should not in principle, have consequences regarding the protection of fundamental rights.
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
On 31 January 2020, the United Kingdom officially left the European Union (« EU »). The transition period provided for by the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU («the Withdrawal Agreement »), during which the Union’s law was still applicable, in particular regarding criminal cooperation,
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
This article intends to identify the legal actions which have or could be led against China in order to render this State accountable for the damages caused by the COVID-19. Several proceedings have already been initiated by individuals or NGOs against the Chinese authorities at the domestic or international level.
