Skip to main content

News

NEWS

Introduced on 3 March 2026, Bill No. 2544 overhauls the criminal framework governing violations of restrictive measures adopted by the European Union. It seeks to transpose into French law Directive (EU) 2024/1226 of 24 April 2024, which requires Member States to establish criminal offences for violation and circumvention of EU

William Julié highlights the violations of Evghenia Gutul’s procedural rights during her trial in Moldova.
Camille Gosson addressed the legal implications of a strike on a school in Iran that may have relied on outdated intelligence generated by an artificial intelligence system used by the U.S. military.
William Julié discussed the misuse of INTERPOL red notices for political purpose.
Camille Gosson analyzed the main legal issues in Marine Le Pen's appeal trial

Review of the 2024 CCF Activity Report, accessible here: https://www.interpol.int/Who-we-are/Commission-for-the-Control-of-INTERPOL-s-Files-CCF/About-the-CCF

William Julié commented on the capture of Nicolas Maduro, President of Venezuela, by the United States of America
William Julié announced Google International LLC was recently served by bailif with a protective seizure on behalf of the liquidator of its subsidiary, Google Russia. This measure will be followed by exequatur proceedings before the Paris Judicial Court.
William Julié recently explained the impact of Andrej Babiš's personal immunity, the new Czech Prime Minister, before the French courts.
William Julié and Gonzalo Boye comment on the situation of one of their clients, Ms. Evghenia Gutul, Governor of Gagauzia in Moldova, who was sentenced to seven years' imprisonment following proceedings marked by serious violations of her fundamental rights

“William Julié, criminal and human rights attorney, spoke to France 24’s François Picard about the repatriation of women and children to France from Syrian jihadist camps, following the third major repatriation in six months. This, as rights groups have long pushed for the return of mothers and children to France

William JULIÉ intervened following the attack on the Kurds in the 10th arrondissement of Paris. He detailed the constitutive elements of the terrorist offence and indicated that the racist motive alone does not characterise this offence.

William JULIÉ gives a quick legal definition of the terrorist act in relation to the massacre in the rue d’Enghien.

Maître William JULIÉ reacts to the revelation of the discovery of four torture sites in Kherson

William JULIÉ provides details on the arrest of Imam Iquouissen by the Belgian authorities. He explained the modalities of execution of the European arrest warrants. In particular, he detailed the notion of double criminality. While some offences do not require double criminality, in other cases, the executing country must repress

William JULIÉ reacts to the power cuts imposed by the Russians in Ukraine and discusses the possibility of a war crime qualification
William JULIÉ reacts to the Ukrainian President's allegation according to which 400 war crimes were committed on his country's territory by Russia
William JULIÉ analyses the guilty plea negotiated between Lafarge and the United States following the financing of terrorist acts by the company in Syria
William JULIÉ comments on French company Lafarge's decision to plead guilty in the US to funding terrorism
Maître Julié comments on Algeria's refusal to repatriate its nationals, in the context of the knife attack in Mulhouse.
Maître Julié provides some legal explanations on the European arrest warrant in the context of Mohamed Amra's arrest.
Maître Beauchemin emphasises the restrictive nature of the offence of participation in a mercenary activity under French criminal law and the resulting difficulty of prosecuting French dual nationals working for private military companies in the Democratic Republic of the Congo on these grounds.
He also emphasised the possibility of the European Union issuing sanctions against the United States, although this would be subject to a unanimous vote by the EU Council and is eminently political in nature
Maître Julié comments on Denmark's decision to refuse extradition and release Paul Watson
Maître Julié provides Le Figaro with explanations on the question of immunities for incumbent heads of state subject to an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court.
Maître William Julié criticizes the Danish judge's decision to extend Paul Watson's detention in connection with Japan's extradition request for his environmental activism.
Maître Julié denounces the political nature of the Paul Watson case
Maître Julié explains the facts alleged in the Paul Watson case, as well as the ongoing proceedings undertaken by his legal team

Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

William Julie, Sophie Menegon, and Juliette Fauvarque Volume 12, Issue 3 of New Journal of European Criminal Law https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844211026378 This article purports to analyze the role conferred to the requesting State in domestic extradition procedures. Despite the existence of a judicial control over extradition, the majority of States included in


Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

What is the essence of the rule against the extradition of nationals? In which cases and across which States does it apply?


Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

The entry into force of the Agreement on cooperation between the United Kingdom and the European Union (hereinafter “EU”) has led to a decrease of certain rights for wanted individuals, but should not in principle, have consequences regarding the protection of fundamental rights.


Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

On 31 January 2020, the United Kingdom officially left the European Union (« EU »). The transition period provided for by the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU («the Withdrawal Agreement »), during which the Union’s law was still applicable, in particular regarding criminal cooperation,


Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/clients/11730fdd62870e8a421f09fe0bdcb468/sites/wjavocats.com/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

This article intends to identify the legal actions which have or could be led against China in order to render this State accountable for the damages caused by the COVID-19. Several proceedings have already been initiated by individuals or NGOs against the Chinese authorities at the domestic or international level.

Maître Julié clarifies the question of Benjamin Netanyahu's immunity before the International Criminal Court